Jump to content

the new elisabeth medal


LACKIE14

Recommended Posts

i understand that the cut off date is 1948 onwards, with over a possible 8,000 eligable, thats hell of a lot of young men even for 60yrs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK guys you got me ? what's the new Elizabeth medal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed, but look at the conflicts.

 

Northern Ireland

Korea

South Arabia Communist Insurgency

South East Asia Communist Insurgency

Iraq - twice

Afghanistan

Sierra Leone

The Falklands

 

The list could go on.............

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a great idea and well deserved , in fact the Canadians have been giving a similar medal out since WW1 , here's a picture, looks like they based the new medal on the Canadian version.

m21_gvir_memorial_cross.jpg

GenerateThumbnail.aspx.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

perhaps if you compare the losses against other nations since 48, perhap that says more about the british armies training and discipline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in reply to kenny the medal really is striking, one perhap for future collectors, to near the bone at present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't go along with that.

 

There are not many other nations who have taken part in as many conflicts as we have since 1948.

 

USA - Korea, Nam, Iraq & Afghanistan - Substantial losses in all conflicts

USSR - Afghanistan - Again pretty substantial losses

France - Indochina & various parts of Africa - Certainly substantial losses in Indochina

 

All in all we rank fairly well against that lot in training and discipline.

 

Other than that everyone else has pretty much stayed home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8000, compared to russian and american losses since 48 for all those conflicts is amazing i agree.

 

i think the losses now are more about how they're reported, when you compare the numbers of losses of some of the ww2 battles.

 

 

p.s no way am i trying to demean the sacrifices these young people are making and i understand your point about all the conflicts i still think 8000 is high i think its because 8000 is a number that you can easily get your head round.

 

i just feel sorry these young guys anytime i see one of those reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One has to remember we have not had the capability either to commit large numbers of men and material,unlike the Americans or Russians..nor has it been our foreign policy for centuries to do so with the exception of the world wars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What has always struck me is the way each successive Govt (throughout history) continues to penny pinch at the cost of lives.

 

We have been in Afghanistan since 2001 yet it is only last month that a mock Afghan village was built in England for training purposes. If we properly invested in the Forces perhaps we would not be debating why we are awarding 8000 of these new medals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...