Jump to content

Authentic?


Ian

Recommended Posts

Is this WWI EK2 as good a fake as I think it is.  Being a novice when it comes to authentication and identifying established makers, I would be grateful for an authoritative opinion.119459543_3220213718056354_6105813546499219679_o.thumb.jpg.4a7edf8fa765f0a33314315df7b8e9ad.jpg

119368173_3220213791389680_6882914205388392288_o.jpg

119463952_3220213898056336_1913689335765895296_o.jpg

119525083_3220213854723007_5501657650598174270_o.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Difficult to say from a photo.  Haven't seen a case quite like this design before, does not seem to have signs of age, the white velvet looks a bit coarse.  However, I think the cross could have been possibly manufactured in the late 1930s or at least before 1945, typical of the finish on this example. Does the ring have any marking at all?

Could well be an original ribbon attached, these are also getting harder to find.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm afraid I don't have access to the item as it is being offered for sale on line.  Another source has said that while the box is highly questionable, the cross itself appears genuine.

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will the seller accept returns? Get a few more opinions

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Fritz, the case does not look 100 years old to me and the cross is not a WW1 pattern. It could be a replacement cross made in the 40's as Fritz says but would really need hands on inspection to be sure.    

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know nothing about Iron Crosses gents so can I have your opinions on this please. Authenticity & manufacturing period if you can?

 

 

20201006_075442.thumb.jpg.081d8a8b75b8d44f36a0a3365097750d.jpg

20201006_075427.thumb.jpg.a844dfbccb9f3b758ca0512af2dd3cd9.jpg

20201006_075208.thumb.jpg.18222397af4d3951df8b28148b68efb5.jpg

Same goes for this wound badge. 

20201006_075923.thumb.jpg.ae5c1e4aa94216df9a4b8766ae7989b3.jpg

20201006_075935.thumb.jpg.79c8fd4abfe62a0f8d7952610322f988.jpg

 

20201006_080003.jpg

Edited by Achtung Spitfire!
Edit photos
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Paul, Iron cross is original wound badge is a copy 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Kenny 👍

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spitfire - on the ring is a stamp, as very often, here - KO - about half of the marked originals have this stamp, others have no stamp, there is a large range of manufacturers each with their initials stamped, crosses of certain manfacturers will cost more, Godet, Wilm, Wagner, etc., all quality marks. KO is probably from the Berliner Münze, a direct order from the Crown. The ribbon is also original, which is an important detail when buying a decoration.
One source states KO as Klein & Quenzer, Idar-Oberstein, who also later produced 1939 crosses, other souces state KO as (contract manufacture to the) Königliche Ordenskommission, which was the establishment itself.

No wound badges had this type of pin, there are otherwise many variations, usually a thinner pin.

Leipziger Münzhandlung und Auktion Heidrun Höhn e. K., Münzen, Medaillen  und Banknoten Auktionen (powerd by AUEX)

Example of an award document issued by the Königliche (General-) Ordens-Kommission

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys know the score hence the question so much appreciated gents 👍

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...