Jump to content

Canadian Brodie helmet with cano netting. Is it real?


Trenchfoot

Recommended Posts

post-37905-0-99351600-1467892392_thumb.jpg

 

Hello! I Purchased this helmet 3 days ago under the idea that it was British. It turned out to be Canadian and the shell dated 1942. However, the liner was dated 1954. Was it possibly used after ww2 as a post war helmet, having the liner replaced? Also, I am skeptical of the camo netting. It hangs over the users face when you wear it, and looks to be ether fake, or field made. Can you guys help me out?post-37905-0-02721700-1467892669_thumb.jpgpost-37905-0-74333400-1467892707_thumb.jpgpost-37905-0-20182900-1467892768_thumb.jpgpost-37905-0-03049300-1467892816_thumb.jpgpost-37905-0-38603000-1467892885_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Trenchfoot , welcome to the forum :) Leon is our specialist on Brodie helmets and will probably be able to tell you who made the liner. Usually I would expect to see a Canadian WD stamp on the inside of the liner so if the liner is British then most likely some one has just added it.The netting is not Canadian either,Canadian netting was two tone with a much tighter netting,British WW2 netting was the same only in one tone.

 

Here are pictures of WW2 Canadian netting.

NET 001.jpg

NET 003.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info. If the camo isn't military issue, was it common for soldiers to possibly make camo netting themselves?

 

Also, a weird thing about this helmet is that it has a black square stamp with some numbers in it inside the shell of the helmet. Do you know what this means?post-37905-0-42918300-1467916263_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum Trenchfoot.

 

The helmet is indeed a Canadian Motor Lamp Co made helmet who made them from 1940 -1943 they also made chinstraps

is there a stamp mark on the chinstrap maybe ?.

The Liner is British made by Fisher Foil Ltd who made them from 1942-1945. it's not clear if they carried on making them when

WW2 ended but have been found with date stamps from between 1949-1954.

The black stamp inside the shell looks like a quality control type stamp I've seen on the inside of liners, the American Army used

a stamp like this on their helmet liners not sure if the Canadians did the same on theirs.

The netting looks like reproduction to me.

 

Hope this helps.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. I don't see any maker marks on the chinstrap but I may be wrong. Where are the maker marks usually located on the chinstrap? I know this sounds stupid but I'm new to this stuff but what was the purpose for a quality control stamp? Was it put on post war? Also, is it possible that this helmet was reissued post war by the British?

 

This helmet has me stumped

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting, the quality control stamp has a 54 on it , if this is a date it would match the liner.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking the same thing! Weird huh?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I'm sure the 54 is a date number, The stamp is more like a passed inspection stamp, most likely the helmet was

factory refurbished re-sprayed, new liner then passed after inspection for re-issue, would have the date and the persons

id number or code who inspected and passed it. Not sure if this is a British stamp mark or Canadian.

 

The chinstrap would have a ink stamp on the inside of the flat middle section maybe a number.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does that make it worth more or less?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would not be worth as much as a Canadian combat helmet, was probably reissued for something like civil defense, still unusual :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for explaining all that! Might have more helmets to post in the future

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to agree with Kenny, civil defence or reservist.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Trenchfoot, after further research into Mk2 1950s refurbished helmets, it seems that both the British and Canadians

both used the same type of stamp to stamp inside the helmet when it had been resprayed and a new liner had been

fitted. Sprayed either in a textured brown or a kharki green colour and most if not all had the liner replaced, later helmets

to be refurbished were sprayed in a lighter green smoother paint from between 1949 - 1955. Below a Canadian stamp

mark on the inside of the helmet in a lighter green mat finishpost-3823-0-05162500-1468251809_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for the clarification on the helmet! It helps a lot!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've also looked into the netting on your helmet, it seems to be the type of string netting produced for the Mk3-MK4-Mk5

Turtle helmet mid to late 1950s below photo's of the type used on a refurbished MK2 helmet. also this type of netting

you can buy in reproduction.post-3823-0-22884600-1468259607_thumb.jpgpost-3823-0-93214900-1468259623_thumb.jpg

 

Makers of post war liners

 

D.P.E.C.-1949-?

CCL -1952-53-?

FFL -1949-54-?

REM (Remploy Ltd) -1949-55-?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a comforting thought. I always thought the netting was fake

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One last thing, does the netting shrink over time, because the netting on my helmet hangs over the wearers eyes. Maybe it was once bigger and tucked under the liner?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is this type of netting was never meant to fit the MK2 helmet only the later 1950s turtle helmet as far as I can see.

You may have to see if you can adapt it some how to fit better.

Unless anybody else has any suggestions.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok I will try to make it fit. Thanks!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...